What happens when the fictional becomes plausible and the criminal becomes desirable?
This is Part Two in a four part series taken from Timothy Snyder’s book, “On Tyranny.” Read Part One here.
Snyder says the second way truth dies is through what he calls “shamanistic incantation”. Shamans use rhythmic chanting to enter into a trance. The endless repetition of lies has it’s own way of creating a nationwide trance.
As the German philologist Victor Klemperer noted in The Language of the Third Reich), the fascist style depends upon “endless repetition,” designed to make the fictional plausible and the criminal desirable.
The Illusory Truth Effect
People are more likely to believe a false statement is true if they hear it over and over again.
The concept connects to propaganda techniques often linked to Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels.
During the 2016 US Presidential election, one candidate made systematic use of nicknames such as “lyin’ Ted” and “crooked Hillary.” In 2024 the same candidate used “sleepy Joe.”
Snyder says, “Through blunt repetition over Twitter, our president managed the transformation of individuals into stereotypes that people then spoke aloud. At rallies in 2016, the repeated chants of “Build that wall” and “Lock her up” did not describe anything that the president had specific plans to do, but their very grandiosity established a connection between him and his audience.”
Plausability
A team led by Lisa Fazio of Vanderbilt University set out to test how the illusion of truth effect interacts with our prior knowledge. Would it affect our existing knowledge?
They used paired true and un-true statements, but also split their items according to how likely participants were to know the truth. For example, “The Pacific Ocean is the largest ocean on Earth” is an example of a “known” items, which also happens to be true. “The Atlantic Ocean is the largest ocean on Earth” is an un-true item, for which people are likely to know the actual truth.
Their results show that the illusion of truth effect worked just as strongly for known as for unknown items.
The conclusion was prior knowledge won’t prevent repetition from swaying our judgments of plausibility.
Frustrated?
Are you frustrated with friends or family who believe things that are clearly made fictional? How can they not see reality? Check their networks.
On digital platforms, repeated sharing within closed networks creates communal reinforcement, where a claim is perceived as true simply because many people in an echo chamber keep repeating it. 
Have you ever wondered where the idea that mainstream media is untrustworthy comes from?
In the 1980s and 1990s, in the US, the end of the FCC’s Fairness Doctrine allowed opinion-driven radio and the launch of Fox News (1996) and MSNBC. These networks realized that questioning the traditional, established news helped build loyal audiences.
It worked.
Did it work on you?
Part 3 is coming soon.
What do you think? Was this helpful? Please join the conversation and post a comment below. Thank you.
Hope grows here. We share stories that inspire people, build faith, and offer lasting purpose.
We’d love to have you Subscribe to REVwords. We’ll put helpful content into your inbox Mondays and Fridays.



Good Morning Pastor Bob! I loved this blog. No, I do not believe the falsehoods & lies spewed from a lot of these alternative news stations. I’m a gal that searches for facts from reliable sources. I have always been like that. If it seems to be far from what I am witnessing with my own eyes…or I feel my gut instincts “kick in”…I always get to the bottom of it. I just don’t listen & believe. I have to know the facts & the truth…before I can make an educated decision. Thank you for sharing your blog with us. Always “food for thought”. Have a great week! Keep on, keeping on. ❤️
That’s a good research habit, Julie.
We I hear or read about what some important people are doing to trick or play with our mind like you have give credit to Trump for doing, I can’t help think you are giving him way too much credit for being smart, clever and deliberate. Your talk maybe describing the results of what a person is doing is very true and we should protect ourselves from this form of example. I guess that’s what discernment is.
I would just caution people in following anyone who does not have a moral compass. That type of person will lead you and the country try
down an evil path .. even if the odd action or policy support your moral view.
Thanks Bob for your platform.
Thank you, Rod, for joining the conversation. It’s hard to know what is strategy with the president. What is real is the ripple effects of the damage done.